What are share buybacks, dubbed ‘corporate cocaine’?


The Week

Left and right in US unite to criticise Wall Street over the booming practice

Share buybacks have boomed in the decade since the financial crisis

US politicians from both sides of of the political divide have bucked recent partisan bickering and united around an unlikely issue to lambast Wall Street for the booming practice of share buybacks.

The practice sees companies with spare money repurchase their own shares from the market, putting cash directly back into investor’s pockets while at the same time improving the value of the shares.

“They have very much been a feature of the post financial crisis era,” says Michael Mackenzie in the Financial Times.

According to TrimTabs data, the value of stock repurchases announced by US companies surged to more than $1 trillion last year, around seven times the amount in 2009.

“The trend is spreading, too” says the Daily Telegraph. Just last week in the UK, blue-chip heavyweights Glencore, Relx and Lloyds all announced that they would sink billions of pounds into buybacks.

“For the past several decades, the goals of American businesses has become benefitting shareholders. Given that just 10% of the wealthiest Americans own 84% of all corporate stocks, this “shareholder primacy” model tends to benefit those who already have means,” says Eillie Anzilotti for Fast Company.

“This is in contrast to how companies previously directed profits, into growing the company and increasing worker salaries,” she adds.

A report published last week from Lenore Palladino, senior economist at The Roosevelt Institute think tank, argues the shift toward shareholder primacy, not coincidentally tracks along with corporate attacks on unions, which played a significant role in protecting worker prosperity.

CNN Business says “the steady drumbeat of buybacks comes despite the political backlash against the tactic”, which has united the left and right in opposition at what has been described as “corporate cocaine”.

Republican senator Marco Rubio has announced plans to overhaul the tax status of the practice, while far-Left presidential candidate Bernie Sanders penned an op-ed in the New York Times in which he said “corporate boardrooms have become obsessed with maximising only shareholder earnings to the detriment of workers and the long-term strength of their companies”.

“Should Washington follow through on one proposal of taxing buybacks at a higher rate, or veer left and ban them unless a company bolsters pay for its employees, the outcome will resonate globally,” says Mackenzie.

“But the politicians are missing a key point” he writes. “Buybacks often reflect the fact that a strong business model is generating a surfeit of cash, a situation that tends to attract activist investors demanding higher dividends and buybacks, as was the case with Apple. For the long term health of the economy, it’s far better that excess cash is returned to investors.”



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here